Don’t you just hate it when you waste time and money on something only to have the rug pulled out from under your feet for no apparent reason? That’s how millions of legitimate .info domain owners feel about Google’s treatment of .info domains.
I personally own three .info domains which I registered because I assumed the .info TLD was for “information” sites just as .com TLD is supposed to be for “commercial”, .net for “network” and .org for “organizations”. I have spent countless hours developing my .info sites with quality original content and the best intentions. It’s a shame that not a one of my three .info domains actually rank in Google for any keywords; not even for a search of the domain name using quotes. Too bad that Google can’t find a better way to handle domain spam.
It’s no longer a secret that Google does not want anything to do with .info domains. Aaron Wall wrote about it last year when Google apparently purged all .info domains from their search results…
![]() |
Was the .info purge a glitch? Maybe, but Google never will accidentally filter out all .com domain names. This algorithmic tweak (especially when coupled with Matt Cutts’ prediction for 2008) shows an internal Google bias against .info domain names. While many .info domain names rank where they did just a few days ago, this does not bode well for the perceived value of .info domain names, especially for brand new domain names or parked pages. |
Why is Google taking this stance against all .info domain owners, even the legitimate ones? Possibly it is due to Matt Cutts’ prediction post…
![]() |
A top-level domain (TLD registry) will offer domains for under $4. The result will be another TLD blighted by spammy domain registrations. |
OK, so the entry point pricing for a TLD is what justifies Google labelling the entire TLD as “spammy” and thus removing the offending TLD completely from the search results?
Remember when you were back in elementary school and something happened in or out of class and the teacher couldn’t figure out who did it? What’s the teacher to do? Punish the whole class for the actions of one unless somebody confesses? Sure these strongarm tactics may get a confession but so does water-boarding. Punishing honest webmasters who did nothing wrong because of a few rotten apples is not unlike throwing the baby out with the bath water.
Punishing the innocent to get at the guilty a baseless, harmful concept. It also breeds resentment in the innocents because there’s nothing worse than getting punished for something you didn’t do.
Fast forward to 2009 and it’s simply mind-boggling that the biggest search engine on the internet can’t find a reasonable solution for weeding out “spammy” domains other than blacklisting an entire TLD. What’s next? Purge all domains owned by minority webmasters?
Anyway, the long and short of it - If you’re planning on doing any type of internet marketing that involves SEO as the cornerstone of your operation, forget about using any TLD other than a .com domain. If you don’t believe me, do a couple of Google searches for terms like “best credit cards”, “promote website” or “diet plans”, you will see that there is nothing but .com domains making it to the first page of Google.







It seems Microsoft is trying to kill three birds with one stone with the latest release of their Internet Explorer browser. IE8, dubbed “Porn Mode”, boasts a wide array of unprecedented browser based privacy controls for internet surfers. In addition to bringing serious competition against rival Firefox to the table, it also takes a stab at undermining 





