<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wordpress Plugin - Digg IT</title>
	<link>http://www.affiliatebestprograms.com/wordpress-plugin-digg-it/</link>
	<description>A discussion of earning with Affiliate Programs, SEO Wordpress Blogging and General Motivational Ideas for Internet Publishers</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Theodor</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatebestprograms.com/wordpress-plugin-digg-it/#comment-178</link>
		<author>Theodor</author>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 06:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliatebestprograms.com/wordpress-plugin-digg-it/#comment-178</guid>
					<description>Hi,

I read a post a while ago (can't find the link) about a guy who experimented with these digg boxes. What he did is this. First, he wrote an interesting (digg-able) article and inserted the digg box only at the beginning of the article, much like your posts. The he dugg it and recorded the diggs and visits and so on. 
Then, he added the digg box at the beginning  and at the end of another digg-able article and he dugg it and recorded the diggs and other stuff again. 
The second article was about 60% or so more dugg that the first article, and it's just because of the second digg box at the end of the post. 
So, it's good to keep that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,</p>
<p>I read a post a while ago (can&#8217;t find the link) about a guy who experimented with these digg boxes. What he did is this. First, he wrote an interesting (digg-able) article and inserted the digg box only at the beginning of the article, much like your posts. The he dugg it and recorded the diggs and visits and so on.<br />
Then, he added the digg box at the beginning  and at the end of another digg-able article and he dugg it and recorded the diggs and other stuff again.<br />
The second article was about 60% or so more dugg that the first article, and it&#8217;s just because of the second digg box at the end of the post.<br />
So, it&#8217;s good to keep that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.affiliatebestprograms.com/wordpress-plugin-digg-it/#comment-182</link>
		<author>Paul</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.affiliatebestprograms.com/wordpress-plugin-digg-it/#comment-182</guid>
					<description>Hey, great to see some people writing about the plugin.  I am glad to hear that you like it and I see that you are using it.  If you have any suggestions just let me know.  Any changes that you make that others might like, send me an email.  We may be able to work something out so that some of your changes can benefit everyone!  Thanks for trying it!

Paul
TUGGO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, great to see some people writing about the plugin.  I am glad to hear that you like it and I see that you are using it.  If you have any suggestions just let me know.  Any changes that you make that others might like, send me an email.  We may be able to work something out so that some of your changes can benefit everyone!  Thanks for trying it!</p>
<p>Paul<br />
TUGGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
